Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 16, 2012, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a BM3 car, was driving the above vehicle at around 08:20 on December 16, 201, and was allowing to turn to the left at the right from the side of the new wall market to the Kim Sea High School.

Since a crosswalk and pedestrian signal are installed, there was a duty of care to safely proceed after checking whether there is a pedestrian who has a pedestrian to walk the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim C (n'e, 46 years of age) who dried the crosswalk from the right-hand side of the road to the left-hand side of the road due to the negligence of leaving the left-hand left-hand turn, and did not discover the victim C (n'e, 46 years of age) and received the victim in front of

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the left-hand flag and the mouth flaging on the left-hand side in need of treatment for about 10 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Photographs of the accident site;

1. A written statement related to a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Medical Certificate (C);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Order to Attend a lecture does not mean that the Defendant has caused serious injury to the victim by violating his duty of care in the course of performing his duties and thus his responsibility is weak. However, the Defendant has been aware of his fault and is against his responsibility, and the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the Defendant has agreed to pay the victim KRW 6 million separately, and the Defendant is the primary offender who has no criminal power.

order for any reason above.