Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are union members of the Korean Metal branch L of the Democratic Trade Union.

On February 1, 2013, the Defendants issued a warning to the victim N, the head of the above company M MM, to the O of M production workers and to leave the workplace without permission. At that time, the Defendants conspired to conduct one person's demonstration by using a kicket stating false details to criticize the victim before the victim's house.

Accordingly, from February 18, 2013 to April 11, 2013, the Defendants conspired with each other, on the front side of the entrance of the North-gu P apartment of the Y, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, the victim’s residence, “hyp n.i.e. LN head who died of workers far from snow in the desire to stop the destruction of the union,” and “the false warning letter discrimination against the worker, the labor pressure LM N head shall withdraw the warning letter, and immediately stop the destruction of the union,” and the victim’s large photo printed diskettes and the victim’s large photo are PAPT 202 p.m.

“LN Vice-President”, “LN shall prevent non-human discrimination and workers’ pressure from being interrupted,” and “explosive against the low pressure, even though the departure level is good.”

The false report, the warning board farb LN far, the phrase "profed worker pressure i.e., the stop farra," and the victim's large photograph was printed, and the victim's one person's demonstration was conducted.

However, on February 1, 2013, there was no false warning issued by the victim to the O.

The facts charged are as follows: (a) the disciplinary action against the labor union members and the labor union members belonging to the LAsan Branch is directly conducted by the LA company, and there is no discrimination against the above labor union members or pressure on the labor union members belonging to the LAsan Branch; (b) although the part is included in the facts charged, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it as stated below in the part of the "decision on the defendants' assertion"; (c) so, it is deleted to the extent that there is no concern about the actual disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense.