The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the victim C(35 years of age) who is undergoing the training course as a professor of dental correction in B hospital and professor.

At around 09:40 on November 17, 2016, the Defendant asked the victim at the 8th floor of the B Hospital in Songpa-gu, Seoul, that “the act of having the E-ray sign the electronic medical register on behalf of the Defendant is not illegal,” and the victim changed the clause that “the act has been done in practice”, “I am kneel kel kel kel kelel kelel kel kel kelel kel kelel kelel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kne,” and made the victim kne kne kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel kel

Accordingly, the defendant had the victim do an unobligatory act.

2. Determination

A. The crime of coercion is a crime that interferes with another person’s exercise of right by assault or intimidation or causes another person to do an unobligatory act.

(Article 324(1) of the Criminal Act as a means of coercion refers to the threat of harm and injury that may objectively restrict the freedom of decision-making or interfere with the freedom of decision-making.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Do7018 Decided November 27, 2008, and Supreme Court Decision 2003Do763 Decided September 26, 2003, etc.) B.

The Defendant recorded the contents of conversation between the Defendant and the victim at the time and place stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and the recording on the contents of the above recording (the recording on the evidence No. 58 No. 1254 through 1274 of the investigation record No. 1254 of the evidence No. 1254 to 1274 of the investigation record No. 1274. The recording on the evidence No. 12 and 13 of the Defendant submitted; hereinafter referred to as “the recording of this case”) is essential for the