(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.05.25 2015고단3272

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.05.25 2015고단3272

철도안전법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 31, 2015, the Defendant, around 20:23, 2015, to D (34) (a railroad police officer) who is arbitrationed over the dispute between the service personnel and the civil petitioner prior to the customer support room in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the third floor in Dongdaemun-gu, the Defendant, “I are currently serving to the public.”

“The test cost was flicked”.

In addition, when the defendant listened to the statement that he returned from the above D, he expressed the statement that "I will open, take the police waste, and Chewing impule", and she expressed the victim's face by hand at one time after being taken to the office, and brought the victim's face to the office.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of order of railroad police officers D and legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention patrol, which are railroad workers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement of E and F preparation;

1. Report on investigation (case concerning the place and place of arrest of the criminal defendant);

1. Investigation report (a photographic photograph taken by a victim of violence), photograph;

1. Application of the investigative report (the screen of the scene of the crime and the screen screen and screen image CD), the caps and photographs and the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts, Articles 78(1) and 49(2) of the Act on the Safety of Railroad from which the punishment was imposed, including the fact that the defendant was punished as a crime of injury in the past, and the fact that the defendant does not seem to repent even after the arrest of the defendant, the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that he did not have any criminal record identical to that of the defendant, and the degree of interference with the execution of duties of this case, etc., should be considered.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고정2286

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고정844

-서울동부지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단2063

-서울남부지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고합63

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고정715