Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 31, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in “C cafeteria” located in Kimhae-si B around 09:35 on March 31, 2018, and no customer is under the influence of alcohol.
A report of 112 stating "A person who is requested to return home from E in the circumstances belonging to the police station of the Kim Sea, who was called up after receiving a report of 112, shall be discarded, "I am, I am, I am, I Ra, I am, and I am ambling."
“In doing the bath theory as “,” and assaulted, by hand, the E’s bath twice with his hand, such as breathing and breathing the E’s breath by hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to E and F;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV CDs and CCTV closure photographs;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that even though the police officer, who received 112 a report and called out, solicits him to return home, the crime is not good in light of the details and the method of the crime, since the Defendant, in a restaurant operated by a good common people, was breading the disturbance of alcohol and obstructing the police officer from performing his official duties by exercising violence.
However, the defendant reflects his fault in depth.
It seems that the police officer did not dump the appraisal and did not commit a contingent crime in a restaurant under the influence of alcohol.
The extent of violence exercised by the defendant is serious.
It is difficult to see it.
The police officer submitted a written application to the effect that he/she wishes to take the defendant's vessel.
There has been no past history of criminal punishment.
In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.