2017Do13879 Violation of the National Security Act (e.g., praises, rubbers, etc.), general traffic obstruction, roads

Violation of Traffic Law

A person shall be appointed.

Prosecutor

Law Firm KA

Attorney KL, KB, KM, KN, KO, KP, K Q, KC, KC, KR, KR, and KS

Daegu District Court Decision 2016 5111 Decided August 11, 2017

December 5, 2017

The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court: (a) as to the instant facts charged (excluding the part of conviction);

Considering that there is no proof of the crime, the crime is not proven. On July 14, 2009 and January 18, 2010, violation of the National Security Act (e.g., praise, rubber, etc.)

The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the Defendant on the facts, and the remainder of each violation of the National Security Act.

· The judgment of conviction as to the point of rubber, etc., general traffic obstruction, and violation of the Road Traffic Act

The judgment of the first instance court was reversed and acquitted.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just.

We affirm the judgment of the court below, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the National Security Act

No error by misapprehending the legal principles on traffic obstruction, etc. shall be committed.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

shall be determined.

Justices Kim Jae-hyung

Justices Park Young-young

Justices Kim Chang-suk

Justices Lee Dong-won