1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 388,939,90 and KRW 344,882,60 among them.

1. The reasons for the statement in this part of the circumstances of the ruling are stated in paragraph 1 (c) of the judgment of the first instance.

(2) (b) the date of commencement of expropriation (2) " December 17, 2009" as " February 9, 2010," and (e).

This Court's "this Court" as "the first instance court", "court appraisal" and "court appraiser" as "the first instance court's appraisal" and "the first instance court's appraisal" are inserted as "the first instance court's appraisal" and "the second instance court's appraisal" with "the second instance court's appraisal, the second instance' as "the second instance court's appraisal, the second instance' as "the second instance court's appraisal," and the second instance's appraisal entrustment with the first instance court's appraiser B (hereinafter "the first instance court's appraiser B" and the second instance's appraisal entrustment with the first instance court's appraisal results are the same as the second instance's judgment's second instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (

(6)The amount of damages for each of the instant expropriated land was calculated as follows: ① 36-5 square meters of Gun automatic 36-5, 56,105,000 square meters of Gun automatic 36-6, 87,600 square meters of Gun automatic 36-6, and gold 65,847,600 square meters of Gun, and KRW 199,459,00 in the case of scheduled vacant roads; ③ 2,402,100, 300 square meters of Gun automatic 96-17, 30,000,000 2,000,000 2,57,000,000 2,000,000 2, 37,000,000, 37,000 won of Gun automatic 5,000,000 won of 5,05,000 won of Gun, respectively.