logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2018.06.05 2018노40
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Sexual assault against the defendant for 80 hours.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable that the sentence of imprisonment (four years of imprisonment, and 80 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

2. On June 23, 2017, the instant crime committed by the Defendant, while fighting between the wife and the husband and wife, assaults his/her wife with incidental equipment and assaultss his/her wife for this reason, and finds the residence of the wife in the divorce lawsuit, which would threaten the wife to be excessively and excessively, and, again, embling his/her wife and his/her children, removed and intrudes on the family in which the wife and his/her children reside.

From around 1984, the Defendant had been living together with his wife several times, and the victims had been subject to hospital treatment and complained of depression and uneasiness and uneasiness, and the Defendant brought a divorce lawsuit against the Defendant. The Defendant was an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant that, in light of the fact that the victims knew that they reported the crime of rape to the police, were able to find out the residence of the victims again, and the victims were waiting for victims by increasing gasoline, preparing for them, and waiting for victims. The Defendant was arrested with the police officer in possession of a knife, the process of such a series of crimes, the form and risk of crimes, the circumstances leading to the crime, and the background leading up to the ordinary Defendant’s domestic violence.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, against his mistake in depth, the relationship between the defendant and his wife was arranged by divorce with his wife, and the wife clearly expressed his intent not to be punished against the defendant in the divorce process, and the wife and his children who are the victims of the crime of this case wished to be punished against the defendant, and the defendant sent his wife for a long time between the victim and his wife and the wife, and the wife was brought to divorce.

arrow