logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.05.24 2018고단2564
출입국관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall arrange or solicit the employment of a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

The defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who have no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea to work in the farm, etc. in Jeju-do, and raised the income with the payment therefor.

Around March 23, 2018, the Defendant introduced B, a foreigner of Chinese nationality, who did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities in the Republic of Korea, as a foreigner for tourism purposes, to be employed by the said farmer by introducing B, a foreigner of Chinese nationality, a foreigner of the Republic of Korea, the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities in the Republic of Korea, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, around March 23, 2018, to offer good offices for the said farmer to work, and then, received 16 foreign workers of the Chinese nationality, who had no status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from May 23, 2018.

As a result, the defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities as a business.

2. Any person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with the competent authority;

The Defendant, without registering fee-charging job placement services with the competent authority, arranged 16 foreign workers of Chinese nationality from March 23, 2018 to May 23, 2018 to be employed in the daily M&D farmers, etc., and received 10,000 won per day among the daily allowances paid to workers.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register the fee-charging job placement service with the competent authorities.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow