logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.29 2015가단220725
이자대납금반환등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 37,460,763 as well as 6% per annum from June 27, 2014 to March 29, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company in charge of the management-type land trust agreement concluded with the Plaintiff on September 30, 2009 (Article 8(4)(e)) under the management-type land trust agreement entered into between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as a contractor of the above apartment (hereinafter “Sco Construction”) and the company in charge of the management of the above apartment sale contract and the buyer.

B. On January 13, 2010, the Plaintiff and Bosco Construction concluded a sales contract with the Defendant for the said apartment Nos. 2801 2202 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) as follows (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B The scheduled date for occupancy of the Plaintiff A, the buyer B, the Defendant B, and the Poco Construction: (The scheduled date for occupancy and the period for designation of occupancy and occupancy may be altered by the process, etc.) April 2013, Article 1 (Supply Price and Payment Method) (The Party A subsequently designated and notified an individual) of the total supply amount of KRW 780,30,00 (10%) intermediate payment (30%) and KRW 60%) 3 (10%) 4th (10%) 5th (10%) 0%) 5th (10%) 5th (10%) 10%) 3th (10%) 3th (10%) 10%) 5th (10%) 10%) 6th (10%) 10%) 10th (10%) 10th 15th 2010, 215. 10. 20th 2015. 215. 2010

(3) In cases where a financial institution requests performance on behalf of a party A due to the failure to arrange a loan under the business agreement of the financial institution and to pay interest thereon, etc. on behalf of the party A, it shall pay the interest, etc. to the financial institution even if a peremptory notice has been given two or more occasions with a grace period of not less than 14 days fixed.

arrow