logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.08 2015가단114131
이자대납금반환등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 34,36,167 as well as 6% per annum from June 25, 2014 to May 15, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 8, 2010, the Defendant sold B apartment units 2802 Dong 1804 (hereinafter “the apartment units of this case”) constructed by the Plaintiff Masco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Masco Construction”).

B. The main contents of the above sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) are as follows.

The indication of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “A”), the buyer (hereinafter “B”), the Defendant, and the contractor (hereinafter “sick”): The scheduled date of occupancy of the apartment of this case: April 2013 (the scheduled date of occupancy and the period of designation of occupancy) and the scheduled date of occupancy of the apartment of this case: (i) Article 1 of the Supply Price and Payment Method (10%) of the intermediate payment (60%) of the first (30%) of the second (30%) (15 March 15, 2010), (ii) Article 4th (15 December 15, 2010) (5th (3) (15th, 201) of the 5th (15th, 2011) of the 15th (15th, 2011) of the 1005th (15th, 2012) of the 2015th (6th, 15th, 2012), and (iii) of the 1001050th (10,5050) of the 10th of the 2010.

(1) In a case where the payment of any balance has not been made at least twice with a 14-day grace period fixed for not less than 14 days due to the failure to pay the down payment two or more times consecutively, or the intermediate payment has not been made at least three consecutive times, and 2) When the balance has not been made within three months from the expiration date of the designation period for occupancy and not less than 14-day grace period fixed for not less than 14 days and the payment has not been made at least twice by the peremptory notice has been made at least twice.

arrow