beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The prosecutor of the grounds of appeal asserts that the court below acquitted the defendant on the grounds that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, despite the fact that the defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the defendant upon the defendant when he was the complainant, it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the complainant, and that there is no other evidence to acknowledge this beyond a reasonable doubt, and that there is an error of law
2. Determination
A. The Defendant is a person who operates a restaurant business under the trade name of C.
At around 12:00 on January 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) caused the complainants to suffer from the face on the floor by pushing the complainants, etc. over the floor by pushing the complainants, leaving the complainants, etc. into the floor, so that the complainants face on the floor by cutting them over the floor; and (b) caused the complainants to suffer from two weeks of medical treatment.
B. The lower court rendered a judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.
C. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below, all of the circumstances stated by the court below are recognized.
In addition, (1) The complainant stated in the court below to the effect that he went to the hospital after the second to third day of the occurrence of the case, but the first diagnosis (in the fifth page of the investigation record) is written as the "18 January 2014," which is the date of the occurrence of the case, and (2) the above diagnosis is written as the name of "the soften and the softens", and (3) it is not possible to find any indication as to the status of the plaintiff's body above the drafting or the softens, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed to have been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant suffered injury upon the complainant, and therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant as to the facts charged of the case is justified.
3...