The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who operates a restaurant business under the trade name of C.

On January 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00, on the ground that the victim E does not drink the alcohol and pay the drinking value, and (b) the victim’s knife the knife the face on the floor by pushing the knife the knife the knife the knife of the knife of the knife on the floor; and (c) caused the victim’s injury to the knife of the knife on the upper left and right right side of the knife that requires two weeks medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the burden of proof for the facts constituting an offense prosecuted is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it shall be determined with the benefit of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Do10096 Decided June 25, 2009, etc.). B.

However, evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case has been presented at the investigative agency of the victim E and this court. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined by this court, namely, in this court, E statements to the effect that the upper face of the floor was teared, and the upper face of the floor was fested," but immediately after the case, it cannot be found that a photograph of the upper part of the upper part of the body (in fact inquiry report to G dental hospital, the investigation record No. 6 pages and the fact inquiry report to G dental hospital) taken the upper part of the upper part of the body of the case cannot be found (in the process of this case, it is difficult to understand that there was no special treatment in the upper part of the upper part of the body and the upper part of the body and the upper part of the body of the body of the case.)