A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 21:50 on the front side of the memorial district in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) around 21:50, the Defendant: (c) caused the damage to the property by planting a rupture between the front glass of the Epoter freight owned by the victim D, which was parked in the said place; and (d) caused the repair cost to be KRW 350,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged another person's property.

2. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the performance of official duties: (a) around 22:15, at the frontway B of Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) received a report and received questioning from the slope G affiliated with the Ansan-si Police Station F police box, and received questioning about the circumstances of the case, the Defendant pushed the chest of the said G at one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. A photograph of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of the statutes governing the place of service at a police box;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment with prison labor (the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties of this case is intentionally committing violence against police officers in uniform, and the nature of the crime is inferior, the liability is heavy, the damage of another's property is damaged without any particular reason, and the defendant has a record of being punished twice for the crime of injury in 2012);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the victim of the destruction of property, the fact that the full agreement was reached with the victim D of the destruction of property, the extent of assaulting the obstruction of performance of official duties is relatively minor, the defendant deeply reflects his mistake, and the defendant has no record of being sentenced to suspension