logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.08.21 2014고정1457
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the 13th apartment complex emergency response committee located in Osan-si.

On September 7, 2013, the Defendant: “D” under the title “D” in the apartment management office of the apartment management office, the Defendant: (a) notified the Nber Kaf; (b) “Igre and plan to the representative chairperson of the E occupant of the Korean apartment complex,” the general meeting of the residents of the past goldday, and (c) investigated the E’s first to the two generations, which had been expanding from around to around 10 to around 10 to around 10, to the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and the Gyeonggi-do Office, and (d) reported the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs to put the civil petition. While the Defendant had extended the total floor, he did not express any way to put the civil petition; (b) made the civil petition to the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs from around 1 to the middle 1, 2000; and (c) made the victim’s reputation that he prepared to fill up to to around 1 to 1 to 20.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and Selection of a fine concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no purpose of slandering the defendant as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under the main sentence of Article 186(1) and Article 191(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Thus, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case are examined, namely, the relationship before and after this case between the defendant and the victim, and the defendant to confirm the victim.

arrow