logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정1715
절도
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 12, 2016, around 07:13, the Defendant parked the 1st floor parking lot under the ground of the building C in Busan, Dong-gu, Busan, and discovered and stolen the 1,000 US$10,000 (1,19,40 won), 1,000,000,000 won in cash, and 2,000 US dollars 1,000,000 won in the market price of 8,000,000,000 won, which is 8,000 residents of the above C building (37,00,000) while parking this vehicle, and 1,000 US dollars 1,00,000,000 won.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the amount of 269,400 won, such as cash and seven cards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Each internal investigation report (Nos. 6 through 9, 11, and 14) (as indicated in the judgment, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the Defendant brought the victim to return locks, but the Defendant did not do so even if he/she was able to have been in the nearest post office or post office, post office, police station, and police station where he/she was in charge of going to work, and the Defendant did not have been in charge of going to the nearest post office or post office, post office, police station, and police station where he/she was in charge of going to work; ii) the police officer's telephone, and iii) the fact that he/she brought him/her out of the parking lot or staff's telephone and brought him/her back to the nearby post, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant had been in charge of larceny at the time when he/she was in charge of the larceny).

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit.

arrow