beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 6, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court for eight months, and imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws in the Daejeon District Court's red support on July 22, 2009.
Although the Defendant had been punished for drinking driving more than twice as above, around 18:50 on June 15, 2016, at around 18:50, the Defendant driven CPoter-II cargo with approximately 0.089% alcohol concentration at the section of about 2 Km of alcohol at approximately 0.089% from the road of about 414-3, the same military-based hot spring in front of the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. A traffic accident investigation report, a report on the detection of a driver involved in the primary traffic, and a written statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in the primary traffic
1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (netly 15), and application of each statute of the judgment;
1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is based on comprehensive consideration of the defendant's age, sex, environment, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and all the conditions of the sentencing indicated in the records, under the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Act, and the sentence as ordered.
The fact that there is a history of punishment several times for the same crime is against the wrong fact.