beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 16, 2018, the Defendant, in the fourth floor parking lot of the building B in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, B around 09:20 on March 16, 2018, the Defendant, who had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had
In order to ask questions that had been doubtful, the victim's front door and door door, but on several occasions, the victim who was damaged by the same act of the defendant's person by driving the D Cost Star vehicle without care and failed to continue to work in the church for about 15 minutes until the police officer who received the report after blocking the front of the vehicle in order to leave the church, thereby obstructing the victim's driving and attending the church by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. Data on investigation confirmation (to reproduce such images) and on-site video recording (ROM) [the defendant and his defense counsel resisted that the injured person was faced with the defendant's arms by driving the vehicle, so there was no intention to obstruct the business, and there was a little disturbance.
Even to the effect that it does not violate social rules.
However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, ① the victim was trying to move the vehicle at the parking lot for his wife and work at the time of the instant case, and the defendant was unable to drive the vehicle on the front side of the vehicle. ② The defendant is driving the vehicle on the front side of the victim’s vehicle, ② The defendant was facing the front of the victim’s vehicle, and was going beyond the floor of the vehicle (the CCTV image at the time of the start of the vehicle is confirmed by the front part of the vehicle after the start of the vehicle). ③ The defendant was resisting the victim’s mobile phone images rather than getting out of the front floor, while selling the vehicle to the victim.