beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, by imprisonment with prison labor of Defendant B, and by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant B [criminal records] Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months at the Incheon District Court on January 14, 2015 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 11, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendants had a disguised office with E and F, concluded a cargo transport contract with a person who reported the false advertisement for the recruitment of branch owners, and intended to obtain money for the purchase price of paper vehicles, and Defendant A provided the name in the name of the representative director of J (Change) Co., Ltd., a disguised corporation, and delivered the amount of damage to E after cash withdrawal. Defendant B took overall control of the instant crime under the name of E, including “L”, “M”, “A” and “A”, and Defendant A intended to perform the remaining business related to the instant crime under the direction of the above E and B, “AF,” and “F” as “the director of the headquarters,” and the F intended to perform the same as the local logistics center of the said corporation.
According to the above public offering, Defendant B made a false statement to Defendant B, on October 2014, stating that “The victim AG, who reported and contacted the advertisement of J, i.e., Kimhae-dong and Kocheon-do, recruited the borrower for the carriage of goods in the passenger transport of the cargo at the coffee shop in the Seocho-si, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, would be paid KRW 9 million per month during the five-day service of the week, and the vehicle price for the branch is KRW 78 million, and the vehicle in possession is KRW 20 million and will be appropriated for the vehicle price.”
However, even if the Defendants received the vehicle price and the previous victim vehicle from the above victim AG, they did not have the intent or ability to provide new vehicle and transport wheels.
Defendants are E, F, and F.