logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.18 2015가단6178
공사대금
Text

1.(a)

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay KRW 15,402,132 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from February 25, 2015 to February 18, 2016.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Facts of recognition

On December 14, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a special agreement with the Defendant that “the construction of a cafeteria building on the ground of the Jeonnam-gun C (hereinafter “instant construction”) was awarded a contract with the Defendant for the cost of KRW 125 million,00,000,000, and that “the construction will be executed according to the drawing. The changes other than the drawing shall be settled at the additional construction cost.”

The Plaintiff completed the instant construction work on April 28, 2014.

In addition to the part stipulated in the drawing of the instant construction project, the Plaintiff constructed the outer floor of the building (the surface of the front section, the front section, the front section, the front section), concrete studs, ground-breaking and treatment for this purpose, interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior (a remote area, an addition of wall partitions and wooden windows, an addition of red trees, a tent alteration), rooftop tower, mechanical room and roof tower, and a rooftop tower, and the cost of the construction is 22,898,148 won in total [the cost of the construction 22,898,148 won in total [the cost of the construction 1,027,847 won in external floor (the front section, the front section, the front section, the front section), concrete typology 645,83 won in front of the building (the 118,489, 483 won in interior interior interior interior interior interior tower, the 111,489, 23639,47,29).

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract for the construction of this case from the Defendant to KRW 125 million for the entire purport of the pleadings, as the result of appraiser D’s appraisal, the Plaintiff agreed to be separately paid the price for the additional construction of this case, other than drawings, and the Plaintiff additionally incurred construction of a building outside of drawings, and required KRW 22,898,148 as the construction cost. As seen above, as seen in the judgment on the Defendant’s defense, the Plaintiff recognized that the Plaintiff was paid a total of KRW 125 million from the Defendant. However, in calculating the amount of the claim, the Plaintiff paid KRW 16 million for the total amount of KRW 16 million.

The fact that he received is the plaintiff himself.

arrow