1. The Defendant’s KRW 86,476,329 and its related year from March 8, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

4.5.To the end, 5% per annum and the following:

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Around January 16, 199, B driven a C Automobile (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”) and operated it on the junck side, thereby causing the Plaintiff to suffer an injury, such as a breakdown of the Jinc left side of the Jinc left side, by mistakenly manipulating the brake system while driving it on the juck side.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

On February 26, 2000, the Defendant paid 94,567,000 won in total to the Plaintiff, etc. as the insurance money of the instant accident.

C. However, on September 6, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the aftermath of the instant accident, and was diagnosed as the bloodless dystyposis and the aftermath infection on the left-hand side. On March 11, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the aftermath of the instant accident.

Accordingly, on March 2015, the defendant issued a payment guarantee certificate to the plaintiff about medical expenses related to the above operation, etc. on the same year.

5. By December 21, 200, the insurance proceeds of the instant accident were additionally paid with relevant medical expenses, etc.

E. Meanwhile, as a result of physical appraisal of the Plaintiff, it was revealed that there was a physical disability in the part of the high-ranking part of the left-hand part of which 15% labor ability is lost, and in the part of the lower-ranking part of which is the left-hand part of which is the loss of labor ability (the application of Section II-D to the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table and the left-hand part).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including each number), each of the appraisal of the body against the head of the original Mine University Hospital and the head of the original generation University Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. On February 200, the Defendant asserted that at the time of the payment of the above insurance proceeds (agreement) and around February 200, the instant claim was unlawful since it violated the above agreement by asserting that the Plaintiff and the part concerning the future treatment costs and the subsequent disability in the high-ranking division were included in all.