The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a form of punishment) is too uneasible in light of all the circumstances, including the following: (a) the Defendant was driving a taxi under the speed of the new wall while driving the taxi, resulting in the death of the victim; and (b) the Defendant was unable to agree with the victim E who is a taxi passenger; and (c) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment (two years and six months of imprisonment and four years of suspended execution (five years of imprisonment)).

2. The instant crime was committed by the Defendant on the part of the victim D (the aged 81) who was driven at a speed of 94.2 km above 20km in a speed of 94.2 km and went to the right from the left side of the victim's driver's vehicle, resulting in the death of the victim, without taking any rescue measures, and went to the scene without causing any injury to the victim E (the aged 48) who is the passenger of the taxi due to the shock of the said accident for about 10 days. In light of the Defendant's driving speed at the time of the accident, the degree of the accident, the degree of the victims' damage, etc., the Defendant did not good, and the Defendant did not receive any use from the victim E, the prosecutor's assertion that the Defendant should be punished strictly is the Defendant.

그러나, 피고인이 사고 후 도주한 행위에 대하여는 비난가능성이 매우 크지만 이 사건 사고 자체는 캄캄한 새벽 시간에 편도 4차로의 도로에서 적색신호에 무단으로 횡단보도를 뛰어가던 피해자 D을 충격한 것으로 사고 경위에 참작할 사정이 있는 점, 피고인은 피해자 D의 유족 측과 원만히 합의하였고, 피해자 유족 측이 피고인의 처벌을 원하지 않는 점, 피고인의 차량은 택시공제조합에 가입되어 있는 점, 피고인은 이 사건 사고 직후인 약 2분 후에 사고 장소로 돌아와 신고 및 구호조치를 취한 점, 피해자 E의 상해 정도가...