All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and June) is too unreasonable.

2. There are circumstances that can be considered in favor of the Defendants in light of the following: (a) the Defendants appeared to have recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendants did not directly commit the instant crime and were injured by the victim H by assault; (c) the Defendants’ age has yet to be shown; (d) the Defendants were the first offender with no criminal history; and (e) the Defendants were the victims of the Defendant B’s assault assault.

However, due to the Defendants’ crime of this case, the victim H suffered severe brain damage caused by serious injury and the degree of such damage is very serious. Nevertheless, the above victim’s father did not reach an agreement with the above victim. Defendant A proposed that the victim H and I want to have a strict punishment for the crime of this case at first time. Defendant A demanded the crime of this case by proposing that the victim H and I were defective. Defendant B did not play a leading role, such as setting the rule upon direct fighting and suggesting that L would commit the crime of this case. Defendant B had a very dangerous and bad character of the crime, including violence crime, and Defendant B had a record of receiving protective disposition by having L assault a number of crimes including the victims, and Defendant B and her ageed after the crime of this case, and there was no change in the circumstances of the crime of this case, including any changes in the relationship between the crime of this case and the victim’s statement at an investigative agency and the victim’s own discretion, and there was no change in the circumstances following the crime of this case.