The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, and 120 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: the crime of this case was committed mainly by the defendants on a 4-month basis when the defendants were able to take part in the victim's internal body, etc.; the crime of this case was committed extremely poor in light of the circumstances of the crime and the degree of injury; the crime of this case was committed three times or more and extended to the victim under three times or more; but the crime of this case was committed, the defendants should be punished strictly; however, the defendants are still aware of all of the crimes of this case; the defendants are under the age of the defendants; the defendants want to take part in the victim's additional body; the defendants wanted to take part in the victim's body; the defendant Eul had no record of criminal punishment; the defendant Eul did not have any record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; and the defendant Eul's age, character and conduct shown in the arguments of this case, intelligence and environment; the crime of this case; and the defendant's motive, motive, means and circumstances; and the defendant's various circumstances after the crime of this case were found unfair.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendants' appeal is with merit, and the judgment below is judged as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the relevant column of the reasoning of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;