1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who exceeds the following amount ordered to pay.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the part in which the part, i.e., conduct Nos. 14 through 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

7) The part of consolation money is paid 10,000,000 won as consolation money, asserting that the defendant suffered a considerable mental distress due to the unfair dismissal of the plaintiff company, and that the plaintiff company had a duty to pay monetary injury to the defendant. It is not recognized that there was a cause for dismissal such as failure to meet the minimum qualification requirements asserted by the plaintiff company or failure to comply with legitimate instructions, and thus, it cannot be recognized that the defendant's claim for this part of the defendant's claim on the premise that the plaintiff company was unfairly dismissed from the plaintiff company is without any reason further to examine the remaining part of the claim, and it is not accepted without any reason. 8) Accordingly, it is reasonable for the plaintiff company to pay to the defendant 1,80,000,000 won for the shortage of performance guarantee money and delayed payment damages from the day after the termination of all commissioned contracts between the plaintiff company and the defendant to the date of delivery of a copy of the counterclaim in this case as requested by the defendant.

2. If so, the defendant's counterclaim is justified within the above scope of recognition.