logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.08.14 2013가단55097
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff Company processed the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products supplied by other companies, made them in the form of powder, and then sold them. From around 2006, the Defendant Company supplied the Defendant Company with the powder powder, the powder powder, the powder powder, the powder powder again, the powder powder, the powder powder, and the powder powder. The Defendant Company used the above powder materials supplied by the Plaintiff Company for the following purposes: “Patch with brub”, “Patch with batch,” “Patch,” “Patch after batch,” “Match,” “Match,” “Match”, “Match,” and then supplied them to the Defendant Company, etc.

B. From that point of view, the conflict with B, the representative director of the Plaintiff Company, was caused by the information of the Plaintiff Company C (B’s birth), and the police began to investigate the facts of violating the Food Sanitation Act, such as the Plaintiff Company and B. On July 3, 2013, the police’s interim investigation notice was issued. On July 3, 2013, the media reports were made by the following purport: “The Plaintiff Company (in the case of an engineer, the company was treated as unsatisfying; hereinafter the same shall apply) manufactured and supplied the horse food using feed materials, food materials with the expiration of the expiration of the distribution period, and the horse food materials kept by the Plaintiff Company were discovered from the food materials kept by the Plaintiff Company, and the condition of the storage was very unsanitary.”

C. As the public opinion on the manufacturing and selling enterprise of non-sanitary food aggravated, the company requested return of all the products containing materials supplied by the Plaintiff company to the Defendant company. Accordingly, the Defendant Company requested the return of 14,312,460 won from Dol Shopping Co., Ltd., the products equivalent to KRW 6,653,60 from Don Shopping Co., Ltd., the products amounting to KRW 6,545,00 from Don Shopping Co., Ltd., the products amounting to KRW 6,60 from Don Shopping Co., Ltd., the products amounting to KRW 14,312,460.

arrow