The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

4. The following note 1) is regarded as “non-humane science, part of the CGU, and part of the sunshine.” The five pages are as follows: “The Plaintiff served as a security officer after April 8, 1976,” respectively.

Under the 6th page, the term “netly lue Hearing” in a line shall be read as “netly lue Hearing”.

7 The 7th line’s “phishing” refers to the state.

7 The following shall be added between the 10 lines and 11 lines:

The treatment of noise in distress (refluence of hearing power) is impossible. It is known that there is damage to the internal noise by means of noise if it occurs. It would affect the occurrence of a genetic factor owned by each individual rather than the environment at the time of war. The limitation of permission for noise would not allow exposure of more than 115dB of noise even if it is short time." At the end of 7th term of “(based on recognition)”, “(based on recognition) without dispute”, “A, 1,2, 5, 6, 8, and 1 through 4, each entry in the first instance court’s evidence, the results of the commission of medical examination to the head of the hospital B, and the results of fact inquiry,” added to “the entire purport of oral proceedings.”

The plaintiff asserts that the first instance court's appraisal at the time of military service was 25% of the degree of contribution to the injury of this case. However, in the medical record appraisal and inquiry statement of the first instance court's appraisal of the medical record of the first instance court, the plaintiff is mixed with the elderly people's distress due to noise and aging, and it is not possible to accurately specify the degree of contribution of the noise in the light of the whole loss of the plaintiff's hearing ability, but if there is a combination of impacts caused by noise exposure and aging with the people aged 65 years or older, the elderly people's hearing in the first instance court's report of the medical record and inquiry statement of the fact-finding statement of the first instance court.