logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.22 2017누68495
장해급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of partial dismissal or addition.

Therefore, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. 20 pages shall be added "(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes."

The 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd b.(c) and the 6nd 5th c.(c) shall be considered as “D.” respectively.

Each "this Court" of the 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st

6.2. The following shall be added to:

“(F) - The noise record appraisal process of this Court is known to reach a maximum of 10-15 years after the width of noise only after the rapid and rapid reduction of the noise, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the noise from which the noise was obstructed cannot be said that the noise was obstructed. - The Plaintiff’s Cheong power was 22.5dB and the right 27.5dB around 2008, around 2008, which did not fall under 40dB higher than the upper left, which is the recognition standard of the noise from the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act. - From January 2016, the Plaintiff’s Cheongwon Hospital measurement of the Central Hospital around April 2016, the Plaintiff’s Cheongwon was rapidly aggravated, and even if the noise was discontinued for a year, it cannot be ruled out that the noise from the Central Institute’s Cheongsung’s initial noise was reduced by 5% or more due to the rapid increase of Cheongwon’s noise.

arrow