logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.26 2017나2006489
가격정산금 미지급금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, this court’s reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for partial revision as follows. Thus, this is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

o. On the 10th 8th 10th 10th 10th 7th 10th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70th 10th 10th 2000 20th 10th 10th 200 20th 10th 8th 10th 8th 10th 201, the above facts of the above recognition alone are inconsistent with the contents of the special contract of this case, and it is difficult to conclude that the defendant agreed to settle the remaining financial resources related to the construction of the industrial complex under the special contract of this case with the moving enterprises including the plaintiffs with the previous enterprises based on the actual occupancy rate.

o No. 11, No. 9 of the first instance court decision, and the materials additionally submitted by the plaintiffs in the trial are also materials for the briefing session that the plaintiffs created, the materials for the briefing session, the news report materials, the registered copy, the joint signature, and the urging.

arrow