logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.12 2017나2032938
점유회수
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.

B. 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s second instance judgment “a company that entered into a building management service contract with Defendant B is currently managing the building of this case.” The fourth instance judgment “each entry” as “each entry or video,” respectively, and the second instance judgment as “23.” The first instance court’s second instance judgment as “an agreement,” and the second instance judgment as “the use, lease, and provision of security” (hereinafter “the instant building”) was immediately made on the third party’s second instance judgment as “the use, lease, and provision of security” (hereinafter “this case’s building”) and the first instance judgment as “the construction contract of this case’s second instance is revoked or revoked on June 9, 2015 and July 10, 2015,” and the Plaintiff’s second instance judgment as to “the construction contract of this case’s second instance” should be revoked or revoked on the ground that the Plaintiff did not perform the construction work of this case.

3. The first instance court’s first instance court’s seventh trial’s “ around March 30, 2015” is deemed to be “ March 30, 2015.”

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. On January 2016, the building of this case is subject to the factual control of the Plaintiff under generally accepted social norms, namely, the Plaintiff’s assertion of the part of the evidence No. 7, or the statement or image of the evidence No. 39 through 47, and the testimony of the witness of the trial according to the Plaintiff’s request.

arrow