logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.02 2017나2056002
단체협약무효확인 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is in accordance with paragraph 1.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

The decision of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance and addition of the judgment in the second instance as referred to in the following paragraph (2), and it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

(An agreement on the list of the judgments of the court of first instance shall be the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance).

(1) The part 1) the amendment of the first instance court’s 3th 19th 19th 19 “Fraud cultivation,” and the 4th 6th 6th 6 “including each number, except in the case where the numbers are indicated particularly.” The 2th 4th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 4th 4th 4th 4th 11th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 2th 5th 2th 4th 2th 5th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 6th 196th 2th 19

3) Article 15 of the first instance court’s decision is deemed to be a witness of the first instance court. 4) The instant agreement was added to the “instant agreement” of subparagraph 2 of the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance judgment, and subsequently, the “the head of the instant agreement” of the said act was deemed to be “the closing and closing of the camping conference designated as a pay holiday.”

5) Part 12 and 13 of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance regarding the “instant agreement” from the “instant agreement” to the “C, if so, is to confirm that paragraph (1) of the instant agreement is null and void as the Plaintiff seeks to reduce a claim in the trial.” 6) Following the “in accordance with the provision of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance and the 16th judgment of the court of first instance”, the Plaintiff’s claim is added, alleging that it was the time when the Defendant started not to pay.

7) The fact that the first instance court’s “Class 19 of the 7th instance judgment” stipulated the instant case’s “Class 8 of the first instance court’s judgment” (the instant case’s collective agreement) and “as soon as possible, Article 8)” (Article 8 of the instant collective agreement).

2. Additional Determination.

arrow