logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.11.28 2012고정875
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 1,00,000 won, Defendant B of 300,000 won, Defendant C of 2,000,000 won, Defendant C of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

While the victim F was elected by the president of the Promotion Committee for H Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project in G located in the Gu on February 19, 201, the victim F was promoted with redevelopment project on July 19, 201, 30 members including the defendant C were held by the Promotion Committee and at the Promotion Committee on July 19, 201, the victim F resolved to suspend the duties of the chairman of the Promotion Committee on the grounds of the victim's suspicion of receiving money from the maintenance company, and the victim was elected as the acting chairman of the Promotion Committee on behalf of the Chairperson, but the victim was divided into two promoters.

Defendant

C is a person who was acting as the chairperson of the promotion committee before the victim was elected as the chairperson of the promotion committee, the defendant A is a person acting as the chairperson of the promotion committee elected after the suspension of duties for the victim was resolved, the defendant D and B are members of the promotion committee, and the I was the general director of the promotion committee

1. The Defendants attempted to hold a promotion committee in front of the H Housing Redevelopment Promotion Committee's establishment of the housing redevelopment project, which is located in the Gu G branch during Ansan-si around August 4, 2011, with ten promotion committee members in the name of the Defendants (violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion). However, the above office entrance was set off and the employees of the service company were found to have been protected, and the entrance was cut off, cut off the locks of the above office entrance and opened the entrance and recruited to enter the office.

At around 18:30 of the same day, the Defendants were at the above location, and Defendant D made a way to potent and enter the employees of the service company in the name-free statement who kept the above office entrance. Defendant B cut off the door to lock, and the other Defendants combine with ten promoters in name.

arrow