A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall pay 421,150 won to the applicant for compensation.

3.2

Punishment of the crime

Around 14:40 on September 30, 2014, the Defendant was under questioning the Defendant on the ground that there is a similarity between the victim C (the age of 57) and the victim C (the age of 57) who was in the police patrol at the time of the police station of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo Police Station D Public Security Center where the said park was patroled, and the Defendant was under questioning on the following grounds: “I am anywhere about 10:0 on the Friday.”

Accordingly, the Defendant: “I see this Chewing feas, I see my her fe, I see it,” and sees the victim’s bath, and when I see the victim’s secret hand with his own left hand when I see about 10 minutes of the face part of the victim’s left hand for about 5 minutes, and when I see the victim’s secret part of the victim’s back at least 10 minutes of the victim’s left hand to avoid the Defendant’s drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer's criminal investigation, and at the same time, the victim suffered injury such as cutting the frame and closing of the internal wall that requires medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and photographs of victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 25 (1), 31 (1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Lawsuit for Compensation Orders;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel made a judgment on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 31(3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings Concerning the Declaration of Provisional Execution. The defendant and his defense counsel followed the defendant who is the victim's self-employed, and instructed the "mother and child", "on the son and child," and "on the son and child," and the defendant resisted with the victim at the time that the victim was the police officer

The victim is first of all.