logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.04.23 2014노1508
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant committed a mistake of facts against the victim D’s mother in a way that the victim’s body spawns away with the victim’s body, and caused the victim to spawn the victim’s hand even with the victim’s hand, and even without having inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged on the basis of the victim’s statement and diagnosis report, etc. without credibility.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the lower judgment can be fully recognized.

1) During the process of noise between the Defendant and the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim saw the Defendant’s arms as a result of the Defendant’s own house and trying to display the victim’s mother to his/her mother, and thus, he/she was faced with the victim’s right shoulder by putting the Defendant on the part of his/her own house and her mother, and made consistent and detailed statements as to the details and details of the injury. 2) The Defendant, who was the victim’s mother, frighted the victim, frighted the Defendant to the stairs of the boomer, and frighted the Defendant, but the Defendant frighted, but the Defendant was frighted, and even if the victim did not speak, it was difficult to believe that other Defendant’s statements were made easily.

3 The written diagnosis of the injury the victim has received from the next day of this case shall be deemed to have suffered the injury in front of the right part and the complete part, which require treatment between two weeks.

Therefore, the defendant's mistake.

arrow