logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.09 2015가단5165891
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant trucking business federation, the KFF Co., Ltd., and the KFF insurance jointly and severally for the plaintiff A 74.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) At the time of the instant accident, as seen below, D driving an ECo-car (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), G MT freight (hereinafter “Defendant 2”), and H driving an Ichip car (hereinafter “Defendant 3”), respectively, as seen below.

(2) On January 8, 2014, D in the event of an accident, when driving the Defendant 1 on or around 02:35, and driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the “K Oil Station” located in the JJ in iasan City, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the “K Oil Station” is shocked by the unexpected vehicle for Defendant 1 to the right side of the vehicle and parked on the road (hereinafter “the primary accident”), while moving to the right side of Defendant 1’s vehicle and stopping on the road (hereinafter “the second accident”), the latter is proceeding with the same road.

Defendant 3’s front part of Defendant 3’s vehicle, which had reeased L and escaped.

(3) In the case of a criminal judgment D, F, and H, on January 29, 2015, the said driver was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or imprisonment (excluding suspension of execution of a sentence) for the reason that the causal link between the act of the deceased’s performance and the death of the deceased was recognized. F and H appealed appealed from the above judgment and were sentenced to acquittal for the following reasons in the Daejeon District Court Decision 2015No557, Jan. 28, 2016, and the said appellate judgment became final and conclusive in the Supreme Court. (1) In the case of the Daejeon District Court Decision 2014Ma1287, Jan. 29, 2015, the witness M& stated that “after the first accident, the victim is shocked and proceeded with the victim,” and the testimony at the court of first instance is somewhat a testimony.

arrow