1. As regards the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is not less than 5,631 square meters in Gangnam-si D.

A. Defendant C shall, as a result of supplementary appraisal in attached Form 1, each of the trees as indicated.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. The indication of the claim: The Defendant C owns each tree indicated as the result of supplementary appraisal in the attached Form No. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 5 on the 5,631 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff, without title, a vinyl located on the part of 145 square meters in the line (b). As such, the Plaintiff sought removal of each of the above ground and return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

Service by public notice: Judgment on the claim against Defendant B on February 2, 196 of Articles 208(3)3 and 194 through 196 of the Civil Procedure Act

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant real estate. 2) Defendant C is the owner of the instant real estate under the name of the wife, E, the Plaintiff.

2) The part of the land in paragraph (2) (b) (hereinafter referred to as “b).

2) The lease agreement of this case (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”)

3) After the 10th anniversary of the instant greenhouse (hereinafter “the instant vinyl”).

(3) Defendant B’s possession of the part as described in the preceding paragraph and the plastic houses on which the said part are located is leased from Defendant C (the former part as to the said part).

4) The land lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C was terminated on March 12, 2016. 5) Defendant B leased from G the land of Gangnam-si located adjacent to the instant land and installed a container on the leased land (hereinafter “instant container”).

6) Some of the instant containers are placed on the part (i) (hereinafter referred to as “A”) set forth in Article 1.2(1) of the Disposition.

7) The rent accrued from November 16, 2016 to July 12, 2017 as to the part A is KRW 111,570, and the rent for July 13, 2017 is KRW 14,360. [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, the evidence No. 1, the evidence No. 1, the evidence No. 3, and the evidence No. 6 (including the number), the appraisal of the appraiser H’s rent for the Korea Land Information Corporation, the result of the appraisal and supplementary appraisal entrusted by this court, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the above facts admitted.