beta
Text
Defendant
A 12,00,000 won, Defendant B 8,000,000 won, and Defendant C 4,000,000 won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 2, 2015, Defendant A posted a false advertisement for the sale of the said vehicle to G, which is a used vehicle sales site, even though the fact is not in possession of the F-authorized Flap Corresing 6,412km of odometer 6,412km as a second-hand box, Defendant A provided false information on the history and sales of the said vehicle.
2. The Defendants’ co-principal Defendant A was asked from the victim H who reported the above advertisement to the effect that: “The cash in possession is only KRW 15 million, and whether it is possible to purchase any scar with respect to the advertisement”; and the prosecutor was willing to receive the above money from the victim by falsely concluding a vehicle transfer contract with respect to the above advertisement with the victim, which is different from the above advertisement, and concluded with the victim with the victim with the intent to receive the above money as the down payment, and the Defendant A was prosecuted to the effect that the victim did not meet the victim’s instructions, and that the Defendant B and the same C were to comply with the instructions; however, there was each statement by the prosecutor or the police of the Defendant B and C, but it is difficult to believe it as it is in the light of the respective legal statements of the B and C, and there is no evidence to support this part.
However, even if this part of the indictment is deleted, it does not impede the finding of guilty of the facts charged, and it does not interfere with the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, and thus, it should be recognized by correcting it ex officio without changing the indictment.
The Defendants were willing to acquire money from victims.
On April 4, 2015, around 19:30, the Defendants were at the J Office of the second floor of the building I in Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the second floor of the building I, and Defendant B, Defendant B, “The advertising vehicle cannot be sold, and the price is not the actual transaction.”
In lieu of the odometer 135,161 km and manufactured in October 2008, the Kgrod vehicle is all expenses.