Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the victim C (35 years of age), was jointly operating a “E” beauty room in Daegu-dong-gu D and A 204 (hereinafter “E beauty room”).

1. Around 12:00 on July 28, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim by fighting in body with the victim due to the use of the official passbook at the beauty art room of this case. On the other hand, the Defendant used the victim’s face at a time, making it possible for the victim to take the face of the victim by drinking, making it possible for the victim to take a hand off his/her bridge, and continuing to boom the victim by his/her hand.

2. On December 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s beauty room business by force by entering the instant beauty room with three male visitors in order to settle a club business relationship around 17:00 on December 18, 2015; (b) intending to go with cosmetic goods, etc. located therein; and (c) harming the victim’s beauty room business by allowing them to return to the customers waiting at the beauty room.

3. Around 10:00 on May 14, 2016, the Defendant destroyed and damaged a cosmetic signboard at the market price with the victim and joint owners on the ground that the Defendant complied with the notice of termination of the franchise agreement received from the head office of the cosmetic at the instant beauty room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. Each investigation report (No. 5, 6 of the evidence list), questions and answers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to provide 112 report processing slips, real estate lease contracts, business registration, etc., written request for settlement of accounts of credit purchase, proof of each content, photographs before and after the removal of signboards, and text messages;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of justifiable acts under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.