logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.07.17 2013고단674
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in the Military Mountain Branch of the Jeonju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju Prison on April 7, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 16:00 on June 11, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) and the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) and the Defendant driven a vehicle of efried Afrient Efrient, with approximately 300 meters in a section from the upper right in front of the mother side of the city in the Donsan City to the front right of the Donsan City located in the Donsan City (Dansan City).

The Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the vehicle internal radio in a total of three times, including 16:30 times, 16:40 times, 16:50 times, and 16:50 times, and 16:50 times, in a total of three times, in a total of three times, in the case of drinking measuring instruments, in a significant reason to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol by drinking while drinking again at a nearby restaurant after receiving a report from G in the circumstances where the F District of the Donsan Police Station affiliated with the Donsan Police Station, which was called.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to take a drinking test and failed to comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on June 11, 2013, the Defendant driven his EP car without being covered by mandatory insurance at the place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the defendant's legal statement, H's statement, state-run driver's statement, automobile driver's license register, and mandatory insurance law

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the Road Traffic Act.

arrow