1. The plaintiff 105 of 105 U.S. I. 105:

A. As to Defendant B’s share 21/63:

B. Defendant C and E shall each be 14/63.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 13, 1933, JJ's birth, the Plaintiff's birth father, completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the sale on November 20, 193, with respect to 105 square meters (hereinafter "the land in this case").

나. 이 사건 토지 지상에는 1933년경 이전부터 원고의 시댁 선조들(시부모, 시조부모, 시증조부모)이 미등기 주택을 짓고 살면서 대대로 주택을 소유하는 방법으로 그 부지인 이 사건 토지를 점유하여 왔다.

C. The Plaintiff, around 1956, married with Nonparty L and began to live together in the above house. On July 9, 1985, the husband died, and around that time, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land, which is the site of the above house, independently, while residing in the above house from around that time.

The net K died on March 6, 1958, and his children succeeded to Australia and solely inherited the net K's property.

M was killed on April 8, 1996, and the Defendant C, E, and N, his wife, jointly succeeded to the property of M, and on December 26, 1997, N died on December 26, 1997, Defendant F, Defendant G, his wife, and H jointly succeeded to N’s property.

(A) The specific portion of the defendant's share of inheritance shall be the same as that in the separate sheet of share of inheritance) / [the grounds for recognition] / The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 13 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply], and the purport

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. If the registrant continues to be the same during the period of prescriptive acquisition, it is sufficient to confirm the expiration of the period on the basis of the point where the starting point of the period is where the registrant can assert the completion of the prescriptive acquisition between them.

B. (See Supreme Court Decision 88Meu22763 delivered on January 25, 1990, and Supreme Court Decision 92Da12377 delivered on January 15, 1993).

According to the above facts, the plaintiff continues to occupy and use the land of this case from July 9, 1985 to the present date, and pursuant to Article 197 (1) of the Civil Act, the plaintiff performs the same as his/her own intention.