Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested on the street in front of the “D District” located in Daegu Northern District C on August 2, 2016, and was treated as the victim on the ground that it would be bad for the Defendant to be treated as the victim on the ground of assault against E in front of the “D District” in the case of assault against E in front of the “D District”; and (b) was employed as a police officer in the D District of the Daegu Gangnam Police Station D, and was in front of the victimized Party F (45 years old); (c) was all killed of the police spicker’s family;

How is, Bohovah and Bohsh et al., all of whom do not die;

In addition, the victim openly insultingd the victim by putting about 30 minutes of this crym brym brym brym brym brym bryms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. On August 2, 2016, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) returned home on the street in Daegu Northern Zone G, Daegu; (b) and (c) conspired the victim E (27 years of age) with the victim’s desire to take care of his/her behavior; and (d) assaulted the victim’s bucks and the fuckbucks with the victim’s fuckbucks that fucks and the fucks and the fucks were fucked once each due to the victim’s desire to take care of bucks.

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the agreement, it can be recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.