1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 38,136,363 and a rate of 12% per annum from August 7, 2019 to the date of complete payment.

1. The Plaintiff, a constructor, such as the marking and painting of the claim and general construction works, has not received the total construction cost of KRW 38,136,363 in spite of the completion of construction by being awarded a contract for the interior decoration business, interior construction business, etc. as set out below from the Defendant who has conducted business with the objective business, and thus, sought payment from the Defendant.

On June 14, 2017, the delayed payment amount of the construction site (unit cost) at the construction site on June 14, 2017, and on October 16, 2017, the Changwon Model Es 1,636,363 Non-payment 6,200,00 Gangwon-si C Model Epis publicity Center 14,00,000,000 on November 24, 2017, 200 new C Model Epis 3,60,00,000,000 D Officetel publicity Institute C on March 14, 2018 on March 14, 2018, the sum of 3,100,00,00, Epis Publicity Center 7,200,000,000,000, 30,36,30,36,30,036, 20,24, etc.

2. A judgment rendered based on recognition (Article 208 (3) 2, the main sentence of Article 150 (3) and the main sentence of Article 150 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) shall state in the written reply whether or not the facts recorded in the written complaint are recognized, in addition to the reply to the purport

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However, even though the defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order on August 19, 2019, the defendant merely asserted that he/she raised an objection against the payment order, and there is no answer as to the facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of the claim, and since the objection against the payment order was not present at the date of pleading, the defendant is deemed to have led to a confession of the plaintiff's assertion.