logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.03.13 2014고합251
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 7. 15. 19:30경 안양시 동안구 D 오피스텔 지하3층에 있는 주차장에 세워진 피고인 소유의 카이런 승용차 안에서 스마트폰 채팅 어플인 ‘즐톡’을 통해 만난 피해자 E(여, 16세)에게 5만 원을 주기로 하고 피해자의 브래지어 속으로 손을 넣어 가슴을 만지고, 팬티 속으로 손을 넣어 음부를 만지다가 피해자의 성기에 피고인의 손가락을 넣고, 피해자로 하여금 입으로 피고인의 성기를 빨도록 하여 유사성교행위를 하게 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on prosecutor's statement to E;

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which prescribes the relevant criminal facts and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. In full view of all the circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, criminal record, and risk of re-offending (no same kind of crime) of the Defendant’s age, occupation, and family environment as indicated in the record, benefits and preventive effects expected by the disclosure order or notification order of this case, and disadvantages and side effects therefrom, it is judged that there are special circumstances that the Defendant may not disclose or notify the Defendant’s personal information of the Defendant] and the defense counsel’s assertion against the Defendant and the defense counsel denies some criminal facts that the Defendant did not promptly cause the victim to disclose or notify the Defendant’s personal information. However, the Defendant denied some of the facts that the Defendant had no sexual intercourse. However, the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court does not appear to have any particular circumstances to suspect the credibility of the Defendant’s statement, i.e., the following circumstances, ① the Defendant’s payment prior to the Defendant and the instant crime.

arrow