logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.15 2017누44215
재결취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion even if the Plaintiff filed an appeal and examined all the evidence submitted in the court of first instance, is not different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable. Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the Plaintiff

arrow