logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.12 2017누85148
임원취임승인취소계고처분등취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) in addition to adding "N" to "J" and "N" to "B" in Section 3 attached Table 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the court's explanation of this case is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of first instance; and (b) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that dismissed the plaintiff's claim for revocation of the disposition request of this case on the ground that there is no legal interest to seek revocation of the disposition request of this case, even if the plaintiff re-examines the evidence submitted in the court of first instance along with the plaintiff's assertion, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for revocation of the disposition request of this case is not significantly different from the contents alleged in the court of first instance. Thus, the part of the plaintiff's claim for revocation of the disposition request of this case among the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is unlawful and dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus,

arrow