Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has a duty of care to raise Pungsan (23 months), to leave the dog, to leave the dog, to leave the dog, and to manage the dog by keeping it under his/her control.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 09:30 on January 30, 2016, 200, was fluored by the Defendant without having the satat of the satur of the victim C, which was fluored, to attack the Defendant’s wind, caused the victim C’s fluort to the said fluort, thereby causing the victim to suffer injury, such as the dratal heat of both sides, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 266 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment due to the same kind of crime, which is favorable to the defendant.

However, without agreement with the victim, the defendant still seems to have not been aware of the risk of the negligence of this case (i.e., the pet dog in a public place).

The above circumstances and other factors, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined by a fine as ordered in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records of this case.