logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.13 2017고단6438
과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 20:00 on October 2, 2016, the Defendant operated “C” on the first floor of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government commercial building B, and raised a white fat in front of the restaurant.

The Defendant’s Mat’s body was large, and the other parts passing through the body were aggressive to the extent of receiving the residents’ resistance, and they were frequently traveling by the people. As such, the Defendant was obliged to take measures to prevent people from passing over the said dog by putting the dog out on the inside and outside of the house and installing a steel net around the opening.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and caused injury to the victim D(7) due to the negligence that enables the Defendant to return to the neck of a large-scale fat dog on the water side, and found the victim D(7) where the said dog was skeing the clothes contained in the mashed hand, and passed away, and did not stick the left arms to the left part, thereby causing about four weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the upper fat photograph of a fat fat;

1. Article 266 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act knows the existence and location of the judgment held by the injured party, and even if the number of lines is shorter, there is negligence on the part of the injured party, considering that the defendant's above opening place, the victim's door is a delivery to the public freely passing through the above opening place, and the victim is a child of the second grade of elementary school.

shall not be deemed to exist.

It is together with the fact that the victim is lele and is not less than that of his superior, and that there was a usual civil petition with respect to the outline of the ruling.

arrow