The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:10, at the C Experience Facility on the fourth floor of the Hanam-si building B; (b) during the dispute with the victim D (11 tax) and the order of use of the above facility, the Defendant used the victim’s humb “Cin, sibk,” and assaulted twice as drinking the victim’s left shoulder part.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the court of parental authority, the legal representative of the victim, has withdrawn his/her intent to punish the defendant around November 16, 2017, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.