Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On February 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:12 on February 14, 2017, the summary of the facts charged refers to the “dward No. Dao-do,” for the reason that the Victim C (13 years old) was changed in the parallel room in the main parallel line of the Nowon-gu, Daegu Northern-ro 223 (No. Roon-do, Nowon-gu).
2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim C, a minor, D with parental authority, and E, a legal representative of the victim C, have withdrawn his/her intent to punish the defendant around June 19, 2017, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.