A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 02:50 on June 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around C Hop House located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the ground that he drinks with the victim D (man, 24 years of age) while drinking alcohol and preventing the victim’s usual behavior, and (b) caused the victim’s loss on the part of the victim’s left part on one occasion due to a shouldered softener who is a dangerous object, and then caused the injury on the part of the victim’s left part on the number of treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (a witness's statement at the main point ctV investigation and the main point ctv investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Based on the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the sentence as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances under the reason for sentencing, the degree and degree of the injured party’s injury, and other various circumstances showing the record, which are the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: Sticking a part of a brush that may cause a serious damage to a brush, and unilaterally inflicting an injury without any particular reason.

It appears that the victim did not have any criminal history prior to the instant case, since the victim did not have any criminal history by agreement with the victim, it appears that the victim did not have any criminal history.